NGINX vs Apache
Both NGINX and Apache HTTP Server are the most popular web servers used to deliver websites and web applications to users.
| Server | First Released | Developed By |
|---|---|---|
| Apache | 1995 | Apache Software Foundation |
| NGINX | 2004 | Igor Sysoev |
Despite serving the same purpose, their internal architecture and performance characteristics are very different.
Architecture (Key Difference)
Apache Architecture (Process-Based)
Apache uses:
- One process or thread per request
- Different Multi-Processing Modules (MPMs)
Common Apache MPMs:
- Prefork – One process per request (high memory usage)
- Worker – Multi-threaded
- Event – Improved concurrency
🔴 Problem: High traffic = many processes = high memory consumption
NGINX Architecture (Event-Driven)
NGINX uses:
- Single master process
- Few worker processes
- Asynchronous, non-blocking I/O
🟢 Benefit: One worker can handle thousands of concurrent connections
Architecture Comparison
| Feature | Apache | NGINX |
|---|---|---|
| Request handling | Process/Thread | Event-driven |
| Concurrency | Limited | Very high |
| Memory usage | High | Low |
Performance Comparison
Static Content (HTML, CSS, Images)
- NGINX is much faster
- Apache serves static files well, but uses more memory
Dynamic Content (PHP, Python)
- Apache can process dynamic content directly
- NGINX passes dynamic requests to external processors (PHP-FPM)
Serving a Static Website
Apache Configuration Example
<VirtualHost *:80>
ServerName example.com
DocumentRoot /var/www/html
</VirtualHost>
NGINX Configuration Example
server {
listen 80;
server_name example.com;
root /var/www/html;
}
- Both configurations serve static files
- NGINX uses fewer resources
- Apache is easier for beginners
Handling Dynamic Content (PHP)
Apache (Direct PHP Processing)
<FilesMatch \.php$>
SetHandler application/x-httpd-php
</FilesMatch>
✔ Apache can process PHP internally
❌ Higher memory usage
NGINX (Via PHP-FPM)
location ~ \.php$ {
fastcgi_pass unix:/run/php/php-fpm.sock;
include fastcgi_params;
}
✔ Better performance
✔ More scalable
❌ Slightly more complex setup
Configuration Style
Apache (.htaccess Based)
- Supports
.htaccess - Changes apply without restart
- Useful for shared hosting
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^old$ new [R=301,L]
NGINX (Centralized Configuration)
- No
.htaccess - Configuration in one place
- Faster and more secure
rewrite ^/old$ /new permanent;
Configuration Comparison
| Feature | Apache | NGINX |
|---|---|---|
.htaccess | Yes | No |
| Reload required | No | Yes |
| Performance | Slower | Faster |
Security Comparison
| Feature | Apache | NGINX |
|---|---|---|
| Attack surface | Larger | Smaller |
| DDoS handling | Moderate | Better |
| SSL handling | Good | Excellent |
NGINX handles SSL/TLS termination more efficiently.